
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Purdue Pharma's deal means money for some victims, end of Purdue company name. Here's what to know14.11.2025 - 2
Congolese rape survivors search in vain for medicine after USAID cuts22.12.2025 - 3
Modern surgery began with saws and iron hands – how amputation transformed the body in the Renaissance21.12.2025 - 4
Bird flu poses risk of pandemic worse than COVID, France's Institut Pasteur says27.11.2025 - 5
Health officials report 14 Legionnaires' disease cases in Florida, gym connection suspected05.12.2025
Instructions to Pick the Right Gold Speculation Procedure: Exploring the Market
Attorney-General to High Court: Gov’t violating draft ruling, risking rule of law
New movies to watch this week: See 'Marty Supreme' in theaters, rent 'Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere,' stream 'Cover-Up' on Netflix
Watch interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS speed away from the sun in free telescope livestream on Nov. 16
Deadly attack on kindergarten reported in Sudan
Merz visit highlights new strategic, and strained, Germany-Israel bond
The most effective method to Shield Your Gold Ventures: Procedures and Precautionary measures
How to watch 'A Charlie Brown Christmas' for free this weekend
Grasping Wrongdoings and Crimes: A Correlation













